Legal Opinion

Booth v. Midvale City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1919No. 2280PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Application to Supreme Court by J. Wilmer Booth for a writ of prohibition against Midvale City and another.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This is a proceeding for a writ of prohibition restraining and prohibiting Midvale City, a municipal corporation of Salt Lake county, Utah, from entering into a contract with said county for paving a certain street within the limits of said city. It is stipulated by the parties that the facts alleged in the answer of the defendants are true and constitute all the facts pertaining to the matter in controversy. The answer, in substance, alleges that defendant city is a municipal corporation of the third class; that the other defendant, John Aylett, is its duly elected and qualified mayor; that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  2. Bryan v. SundbergTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Scott v. FordOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. City of Memphis v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. District Township of Dubuque v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atwood v. Cox, District JudgeUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Spring Canyon Coal Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Wicks v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Morgan v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Sidney Stevens Implement Co. v. Ogden CityUtah Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API