Legal Opinion

Frankel v. German Tyrolean Alps Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Now. Wm. ill. Kinsey, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBland, P. J.

Defendant is a corporation, and obtained from the Louisiana Purchase Exposition Company a concession known as the Tyrolean Alps. By written contract it leased to plaintiff booths 25, 26, and 27, house No. 4, of the Alps, to be used by plaintiff for a photographic studio during the exposition period, and granted to plaintiff, for and during the exposition period, “the sole and exclusive privilege within said concession, of taking and selling photographs of individuals and groups of individuals as well within said studio as without same, in the front of the buildings and mountains, ‘Provided,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greenleaf v. GoodrichSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Luke v. Calhoun CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1875

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Haggard v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bonsall's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Texas Company v. C.F. SiefriedWyoming Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Commercial Nat. Bank of Checotah v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API