Legal Opinion

Handam v. Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLC

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 16, 2010No. C040634CV; A128759PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This case is before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court, Handam v. Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLC, 347 Or 533, 225 P3d 43 (2010), with instructions to reconsider it in light of the court’s decision in Lamson v. Crater Lake Motors, Inc., 346 Or 628, 216 P3d 852 (2009), which affirmed our decision in Lamson v. Crater Lake Motors, Inc., 216 Or App 366, 173 P3d 1242 (2007). On remand, we observe that the Supreme Court’s decision in Lamson makes it clear that we applied the correct legal test in our original opinion in this case, Handam v. Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLC, 225 Or App…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lamson v. Crater Lake Motors, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Handam v. Wilsonville Holiday Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Lamson v. Crater Lake Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sharma v. Providence Health & Services-OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  2. Nkrumah v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. Koller v. SchmaingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Roberts v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  5. Hernandez-Nolt v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API