Legal Opinion

Lamson v. Crater Lake Motors, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2009No. CC 04-2609-L3; CA A130759; SC S055625PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

In this wrongful discharge action, plaintiff seeks review of a Court of Appeals decision overturning a jury verdict in his favor. Plaintiff argues that, contrary to the Court of Appeals’ view, his discharge was tortious, because he was fired for engaging in conduct that fulfilled an important societal obligation. For the reasons set out below, we reject that argument and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

When this court reviews a grant of a directed verdict, which, according to the Court of Appeals, the trial court should have entered in this case, we view the facts in the light…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nees v. HocksOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Delaney v. Taco Time International, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Babick v. Oregon Arena Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Boothby v. D.R. Johnson Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Babick v. Oregon Arena Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Huber v. Oregon Department of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Walker v. Oregon Travel Information CouncilOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Boyd v. Legacy HealthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Lucas v. Lake CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. McManus v. AuchinclossCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API