Legal Opinion

Cleveland v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 25, 1969No. 124, September Term, 1969PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

THE ADMISSION OF EVIDENCE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH AND SEIZURE INCIDENT TO AN ARREST — THE FUNCTIONS OF THE CO URT AND JUR Y.

In Price v. State, 7 Md. App. 131 we held that the admissibility of evidence obtained by a search and seizure warrant claimed to be invalid was a matter exclusively for the court. We said, at 143:

“Thus in a jury trial, when the issue is properly raised by objection or motion to suppress or exclude evidence claimed to have been so unlawfully obtained, and the issue had not been determined prior to trial or the issue is entertained by the trial court upon the grant of a…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gaudio v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  4. Day v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  5. Ralph v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Everhart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Simmons v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  3. Mulligan v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Carter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1973

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API