Scott v. Hanford
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Tallman, J., entered. March 14, 1903, denying defendant’s motion to vacate a judgment entered April 19, 1897.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
On April 19, 1897, in the superior court of King county, the respondent recovered judgment against C. T. LeBallister and the appellant, Frank Hanford, for the sum of $516.48, due upon a promissory note executed by the judgment debtors in favor of the respondent. The judgment was entered by default, on a return made by the sheriff showing personal service on both of the defendants, in King county. The judgment remained-on the records uncollected until. December 24, 1902, when the respondent began proceedings to- revive the same, causing notice of his application to be served upon the…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Bolcom Mills, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Thompson v. ShortWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Rowe v. SilbaughWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re HigdonWashington Supreme Court · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.