Legal Opinion

Arrott v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided February 7, 1902No. 16PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity Sur motion to strike off plea.

1Opinion of the Court

ACHESON, Circuit Judge.

Every defense which may be a full answer to the merits of a bill in equity is not, of course, to be considered as entitled to be brought forward by way of plea. Story, Eq. PI. § 952. The true, end of a plea is to save the parties the expense of the examination of the witnesses at large, and the defense proper for a plea is such as reduces the cause, or some part of it, to a single point. Id. This is a suit in equity for the infringement of a patent, and the bill is in the usual form. The defendant has filed a plea setting up the prior invention and use by one Marschute…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sharp v. ReissnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1881
  2. Korn v. WiebuschU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1887
  3. Knox Rock-Blasting Co. v. Rairdon Stone Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1898
  4. Carnrick v. McKessonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1881
  5. Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thresher v. General Electric Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1906
  2. American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. Bayless Pulp & Paper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania · 1908
  3. Duntley Mfg. Co. v. Keller Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API