Legal Opinion

American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. Bayless Pulp & Paper Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania

Decided June 6, 1908No. 36PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. On motion to strike off plea.

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBAFD, District Judge.

“The cautious practitioner,” says Mr. Foster (1 Foster’s Fed. Pract. § 143), “will act wisely in eschewing the use of pleas, unless he desires to plead matter in abatement, or in extraordinary cases; for it is as true now as in the time of Beames [Beames on Pleas, 61] that the subject of pleas in equity is one ‘concerning which so much remains to be elucidated, that it may be said of them, maxima pars eorum quae scimus est, minima eorum quae ignoramus.’ ” Something of the same kind no doubt was also in the mind of Vice Chancellor Kindersley when he declared in Hanby…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jones v. BergerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maryland · 1893
  2. Sharp v. ReissnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1881
  3. Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Philadelphia & R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895
  4. Panzl v. Battle Island Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
  5. Burrell v. HackleyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duntley Mfg. Co. v. Keller Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API