Legal Opinion

Edison Electric Light Co. v. United States Electric Lighting Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided May 15, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Equity. Bill for infringement. On plea.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

The plea to the hill of complaint, which has been sot down for argument, alleges in substance that the defendant should not be compelled to answer, because by reason of the facts averred in the plea the remedy of the complainant is plain, adequate, and complete at law, and this court should not take cognisance in equity of the suit.

The hill alleges the infringement by the defendant of letters patent of the United States No. 263,140, dated August 22, 1882, granted to the complainant upon the application of Edison, for an improvement in dynamo-electric machines, the invention of Edison. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. United States v. BowenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Wickliffe v. OwingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Delafield v. KinneyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
  5. A. C. & W. A. Smets v. WilliamsNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arrott v. Standard Sanitary Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API