Legal Opinion
Lee E. WANGER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. G.A. GRAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 6, 1989No. 88-3444PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILBURN, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Lee Wanger appeals from the summary judgment granted by the district court on April 18,1988, and the subsequent amended summary judgment entered on May 2, 1988, in favor of defendant-appellee G.A. Gray Company (“Gray”) which dismissed this action filed pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA” or “Act”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (1985). The issue before us is whether the district court erred in holding that Wanger’s failure to apply for an available position with Gray, his former employer, is fatal to his ADEA claim. For the reasons…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hooks v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Patricia Babrocky v. Jewel Food Company and Retail Meatcutters Union, Local 320, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Pram Nguyen v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Robert v. McDonald v. Union Camp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Williams v. Giant Food Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Williams v. Giant Food Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Ronald C. Leadbetter v. J. Wade GilleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.