Legal Opinion

People v. Ortiz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 7, 1990PublishedCited by 60 opinions

POINTS OF COUNSEL

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Alexander, J.

Defendant, convicted of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, assigns error to the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury as to the agency defense. We conclude that such instruction was not warranted because no reasonable view of the evidence would support a finding that defendant, who directed a potential purchaser to a seller of narcotics, was acting as an agent of that purchaser.

Defendant was arrested in the course of a "buy and bust” operation conducted on Morris Avenue in the Bronx on January 6, 1986. According to the trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WattsNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. Lam Lek ChongNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. PadgettNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. People v. ArgibayNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. People v. RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. People v. HerringNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. People v. EchevarriaNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. People v. OrtizNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. People v. WatsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. People v. AlvarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API