Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Fortner
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 29, 1993No. 92-0912PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
629 So.2d 1036 (1993)
Susanne Rae SCHMIDT, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Karl F. Schmidt; Gene J. Schmidt, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Etha Mae Schmidt; and Susanne Rae Schmidt, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Karl F. Schmidt, Jr., Appellants,
v.
Lloyd B. FORTNER, individually; Bernard S. Schmidt, individually, as former Personal Representative of the Estate of Karl F. Schmidt, as former Personal Representative of the Estate of Etha Mae Schmidt, and as Trustee under the Will of Etha Mae Schmidt, Appellees.
No. 92-0912.
District…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Timmons v. CombsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Williams v. BrochuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Bridges v. NewtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3Cited by76 opinions
- TGI Friday's, Inc. v. DvorakSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- McMahan v. TotoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Southeast Floating Docks, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
- Knealing v. PuleoSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Eagleman v. EaglemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.