Knealing v. Puleo
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
675 So.2d 593 (1996)
Rhonda KNEALING, Petitioner,
v.
Ernest PULEO and Maria J. Puleo, Respondents.
No. 85849.
Supreme Court of Florida.
June 20, 1996.
Michael S. Bendell of Michael Bendell, P.A., Boca Raton, for Petitioner.
Robert H. Schwartz and Scott C. Burgess of Gunther & Whitaker, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Respondents.
WELLS, Justice.
We have for review Puleo v. Knealing, 654 So.2d 148 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), in which the district court certified the following question to be of great public importance:
DO THE TIME REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 44.102, FLORIDA STATUTES (1993), REPRESENT AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited15 opinions
- TGI Friday's, Inc. v. DvorakSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Cramp v. BOARD OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION OF ORANGESupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Schmidt v. FortnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Timmons v. CombsSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Nordyne v. Florida Mobile Home SupplyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Southeast Floating Docks, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
- In Re Amend. to Fla. Rules of Civ. Proc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Massey v. DavidSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- State v. RaymondSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Gulliver Academy, Inc. v. BodekSupreme Court of Florida · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.