Legal Opinion
American Slicing Machine Co. v. Rothschild & Lyons
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1929No. 3712PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.
Plaintiff sued defendants to be decreed owner of a certain slicing machine numbered 217427 and restored to the possession of it, and, in the alternative for $128.20, as its value, if restoration were not made.
It alleged that it had conditionally sold' the machine to one Chrest Slavent, at the time a resident of the state of Louisiana, for the price of $200, and that he had paid $71.80 and still owed $128.20 of the amount; that the offer of purchase was made to it in the state of Illinois and accepted by it there, and the machine delivered to a carrier in the state of Indiana for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. St. Louis Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Overland Texarkana Co. v. BickleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- State v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Burnett v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Byrd v. CooperSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. HulettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- McKane v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
- Fisher v. BullingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
- Finance Security Co. v. MexicLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. Victor Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.