Legal Opinion
United States v. Jae Gab Kim
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 25, 2006No. 05-50112PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge.
ORDER
The opinion filed on April 10, 2006, is amended as follows:
On slip opinion page 3929, line 9, beginning with “Over-the-counter sales ...” and ending line 12 with “from ‘regulated transactions.’ ” delete and replace with the following:
Over-the-counter sales of pseudoephed-rine that are not “ordinary,” however, may be regulated transactions, because they are not necessarily included in the exemption from regulated transactions.
On slip opinion page 3929, line 12, after “exemption from ‘regulated transactions.’ ” insert the following footnote:
The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Faisal Nabin Kashem v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Christopher OsingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Other MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. BacklundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.