Legal Opinion

United States v. Backlund

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 26, 2012No. Nos. 10-30264, 10-30289PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The opinion filed April 26, 2012 and appearing at 677 F.3d 930 (9th Cir.2012), is AMENDED as follows:

1. At page 4441 of the slip opinion (677 F.3d at 944), the following sentence is deleted:

The government, however, can mitigate this potential for delay by promptly initiating enforcement actions and defending the agency decision in those proceedings, and replaced with:

The government, however, can mitigate this potential for delay by promptly initiating judicial proceedings and defending the agency decision in those proceedings.

2. At page 4441 of the slip opinion (677 F.3d at 944), the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Valle Del Sol v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Maya Arce v. John HuppenthalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Ken McMaster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API