Legal Opinion

Hoyt v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1935No. Civ. 9312PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDMONDS, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff recovered judgment upon the verdict of a jury for damage to a trailer struck by one of the trains of the defendant railway at a crossing in the city of Oxnard. The points presented by the defendant on appeal are that the evidence shows that the driver of the truck was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law; that there is no evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant; and that the court erred in instructing the jury.

By the court’s instructions the jury was given the definition and effect of a presumption and told that “it is presumed that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Howard v. WorthingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Tyson v. BurtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Zolkoske v. United States Farm & Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Plotts v. AlbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Dutcher v. City of Santa Rosa High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Aurenz v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API