Legal Opinion
Hall v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 6, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 90-2232-VPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, District Judge.
This case is before the court on the motion (Doc. 27) of defendants Merck, Sharp *602& Dohme and Merck & Co., Inc., for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b). The motion is denied.
Plaintiff brought this product liability action against defendants seeking damages for personal injuries resulting from an alleged breach of implied warranties under the Uniform Commercial Code. See, 111. Rev.St., ch. 26, ¶¶ 1-101 et seq. The instant motion for summary judgment presents a conflict-of-laws issue: i.e., whether Kansas or Illinois law applies. If, as…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Ingersoll v. KleinIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Berry v. G. D. Searle & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- Kennedy v. City of SawyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
- Diane C. Martin v. Nelson Stokes T/a Nelson Stokes Garage and Allen R. LisenbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hall v. Merck, Sharp & DohmeDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1991