Legal Opinion
Hall v. Merck, Sharp & Dohme
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 27, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-2232-VPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN BEBBER, District Judge.
This case is before the court on the motion (Doc. 56) of defendants Merck, Sharp & Dohme and Merck & Co., Inc., for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b). Plaintiff Charlotte Hall has responded (Doc. 67) and opposes defendants’ motion. The motion is granted.
Plaintiff brought this products liability action against defendants seeking damages for personal injuries that she allegedly suffered as the result of ingesting Dolobid, a prescription drug manufactured and distributed by defendants. Plaintiff claims that, by manufacturing and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Mahr v. G. D. Searle & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- Leesley v. WestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wright Ex Rel. Trust Co. v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2008
- Nowell v. Medtronic Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Bartlett v. MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICAL CO., INC.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
- Bartlett v. Mutual PharmaceuticalDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.