Legal Opinion
In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided November 21, 2020No. 2:11-cv-01016Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS IN RE: OHIO EXECUTION : Case No. 2:11-cv-1016 PROTOCOL LITIGATION : District Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. : Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz This document relates to Plaintiff Lawrence Landrum. : REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SHOULD BE DENIED EXCEPT AS PREVIOUSLY RECOMMENDED This consolidated § 1983 method of execution case is before the Court on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 2890) the Second Amended Individual Supplemental Complaint of Plaintiff Lawrence…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- University of Texas v. CamenischSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Baze v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Glossip v. GrossSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.