Legal Opinion
Birkhofer v. Krumm
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 21, 1935No. Civ. 1533PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from an order discharging an attachment and the attached property from the attachment lien.
The facts of the case are not in dispute and may be summarized as follows:
On March 27, 1928, W. E. Grigsby and Florence Gill Grigsby executed their promissory note in the sum of $48,000 to V. J. Attwood, one of the appellants here. The note was payable in annual installments of $5,000 for a period of eight years, and of $8,000 thereafter. It carried interest at the rate of seven per cent per annum, payable semi-annually. The note contained the usual acceleration clause.
On April 14,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Bogart v. George K. Porter Co.California Supreme Court · 1924
- McKean v. German-American Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. ChotinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Winklemen v. SidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Lindsay v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Ingalls v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.