Inland Steel Products Co. v. MPH Manufacturing Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ROBSON, District Judge.
These three cases, consolidated for trial, involve a controversy over the title to inventions pertaining to the construction of metal arch type trussless buildings, as well as the validity and alleged infringement of patents on such structures. On June 28, 1957, an order was entered, pursuant to motion under Rule 39(b), Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., ruling that all issues in these cases triable by jury as a matter of right be so tried. On January 29, 1958, at a pretrial conference, it was agreed that the parties would submit memoranda on the question as to which…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Enelow v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Swofford v. B & W, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Laverty v. Alaska RR Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 2000
- Control Center, L.L.C. v. LauerDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- In re Yarn Processing Patent Validity LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1979
- Harkobusic v. General American Transportation Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.