Ward v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. On motion to recall remittitur and to reconsider the order of dismissal of the appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, J.
When this cause came on for trial at the October, 1894, session of this court, the appeal was dismissed on motion of respondent, for the reason that it appeared that the notice of appeal and the appeal bond had not been filed in the court below within the time limited by § 4 of the appeal act of March 8,1893 (Laws 1893, p. 121); On December 18, 1894, the appellant filed a motion or petition for a re-hearing and for a re- • instatement of the appeal, which, after • due consideration, was denied, and on April 26,1895, the remittitur was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boyd v. BurrelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Carey v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- McDonald v. BowmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Boston v. HaynesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Smith v. BrannanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ott v. BoringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
- Horton v. State ex rel. HaydenNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
- Kosten v. FlemingWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Egbert v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- In Re the Estate of YandWashington Supreme Court · 1945
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.