Denver v. Schmid
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke
These parties are hereinafter referred to as Schmid and the city respectively.
Schmid was charged with violation of a city ordinance, tried in the municipal court and convicted. He thereupon appealed to the county court where, at the close of the city’s case, defendant moved for dismissal on eleven grounds. The motion was sustained and to review the judgment thereupon entered accordingly the city prosecutes this writ.
Three errors are assigned: (1) The sustaining of the motion ; (2) the discharging of the defendant ; (3) entering judgment for defendant. That the last two are so clearly without…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Patton v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Newman v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Ernesti v. City of Grand IslandNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
- McClelland v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
- Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Colorado Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1935
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Board of Barber Examiners v. CloudIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- Oklahoma City v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- City of Huron v. MunsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
- Amitrano v. BarbaroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1938
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.