Legal Opinion
Dean v. Bondurant
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided June 7, 2006No. 2005-SC-000872-DRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER OF RECUSAL
ROACH, Justice.
On December 6, 2005, the Movants filed a motion to disqualify me from participating in the decision whether to grant their Motion for Discretionary Review, filed on November 7, 2005, and any further proceedings, should they be necessary. While the Movants fail to cite any legal authority in their motion, they appear to claim that my “impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” SCR 4.300, Canon 3E(1). The Movants base their claim on the fact that Respondents’ counsel, James E. Milliman, and some Respondents, including Winston E. Miller and certain other members…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Cheney v. United States District Court for the District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Microsoft Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Adair v. State, Dept. of Educ.Michigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Williamson v. Indianapolis Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- James Freeman v. Pittsburgh Glass Works LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- State v. AllenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
- Alred v. Commonwealth, Judicial Conduct CommissionKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Adkins v. Wrightway Readymix, LLCCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2016
- Taylor v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.