Legal Opinion

United States v. King

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided May 24, 1984No. ACM S26207PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

CANELLOS, Judge:

Before a special court-martial with members, the accused was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of possession and transfer of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for five months, forfeiture of $382.00 per *536month for five months and reduction to airman basic.

On appeal, the accused makes two claims of error: (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; and (2) that he was denied a speedy review of his case. We do not address the first claim but we do find, on the facts,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  2. United States v. ClevidenceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  4. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  5. United States v. TuckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. DunbarU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
  2. United States v. BourgetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. United States v. BourgetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API