United States v. King
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
CANELLOS, Judge:
Before a special court-martial with members, the accused was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of possession and transfer of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). The approved sentence extends to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for five months, forfeiture of $382.00 per *536month for five months and reduction to airman basic.
On appeal, the accused makes two claims of error: (1) that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction; and (2) that he was denied a speedy review of his case. We do not address the first claim but we do find, on the facts,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. BanksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. ClevidenceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. TuckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. DunbarU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. BourgetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. BourgetteU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989