Legal Opinion

D D & P Realty, Inc. v. Robustiano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 24, 2009PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

Plaintiff commenced this action alleging that defendants breached a contract by providing substandard work. Supreme Court entered a default judgment against defendants as to liability and ordered an inquest to determine damages (see CPLR 3215). After the inquest, the court held that defendant Gino Robustiano, individually and doing business as Calabrese Masonry, was liable to plaintiff for $32,000. The court, however, *1497without the benefit of a motion to vacate the default, revisited its determination of liability against defendant Jarrod Haas, individually and doing business as J. Haas & Sons,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rokina Optical Co. v. Camera King, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Amusement Business Underwriters v. American International Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Christian v. Hashmet Management Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Shlang v. InbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. 247-59 West, LLC v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 2010
  3. Shlang v. InbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. Shlang v. InbarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API