Caflisch v. Staum
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.
¶ 1. Randy Caflisch appeals the probate court's construction of Bessie Kuhn's will. Kuhn used a standard Wisconsin basic will. The will lists four recipients in the section for gifting property. However, although the will contains instructions that a signature is required next to every gift, there is no signature next to the gift for the final recipient, Julie Paskavis (n/k/a Julie Staum). The probate court concluded that Kuhn had substantially complied with the instructions and found the gift valid. Because the statute requires the testator's signature in order to make the gift, we reverse…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Chayka v. SantiniWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- In Interest of Angel Lace M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- In Matter of Estate of LohrCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- David MacLeish v. Boardman & Clark LLPWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- State Ex Rel. Griffin v. LitscherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Barritt v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
- Czaplewski v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012
- David MacLeish v. Boardman & Clark LLPWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.