Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Griffin v. Litscher
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided February 27, 2003No. 02-1704PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.
¶ 1. Darrell W. Griffin appeals from an order quashing his petition for a writ of mandamus. Griffin asserts that the trial court erred when it concluded that the provisions of Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 57, § 138 (West 2001) did not entitle him to credit against his Wisconsin prison sentence. He seeks reversal of the order quashing his petition and a recalculation of his sentence to include one thousand and eighty-six days of Oklahoma "earned and achievement credits." We conclude that Wisconsin and not Oklahoma law determines the length of Griffin's sentence. We therefore affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McGinnis v. RoysterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Prue v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Malone v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Barksdale v. LitscherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Harr v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State Ex Rel. Myers v. SwensonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Malone, Norman L. v. Corrections Corp AmeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.