Legal Opinion
Appliance Associates, Inc. v. Dyce-Lymen Sprinkler Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 26, 1986PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Special Term erred in granting defendant, Sonitrol Security Systems of Buffalo, Inc., summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ cause of action for breach of contract. *513Plaintiffs, the tenant and owners of a commercial building, allege that after closing hours on January 14, 1981, water flowing from a burst sprinkler pipe caused extensive damage and interrupted the tenant’s business operations. Sonitrol, which had installed a sound detection security system in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Florence v. Merchants Central Alarm Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Antical Chemicals, Inc. v. Westinghouse Security Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Corporate Leasing, Inc. v. AFA Protective Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Eaves Brooks Costume Co. v. Y.B.H. Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Corral v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- World Trade Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Lido Knitting Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Tate v. Clancy-Cullen Storage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Rivkin v. BrackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.