Legal Opinion
Antical Chemicals, Inc. v. Westinghouse Security Systems, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 29, 1982No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion granted in accordance with the following memorandum: Plaintiffs, the lessor and owner respectively of a warehouse in Rochester, New York, seek to recover $600,000 in damages sustained when the warehouse and its contents were consumed by fire in 1977, allegedly because of the failure of a fire alarm system. Defendant Westinghouse Security Systems, Inc., installed the system in 1972 for a charge of $3,070, and it was' owned by plaintiff Antical. As designed, the system provided warning by sensors that activated a siren on the building. At…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- A & J Concrete Corp. v. ArkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1966
- Florence v. Merchants Central Alarm Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rinaldi & Sons, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Alarm Service, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- 80-82 Greene Street Corp. v. AFA Protective System, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1979
3Cited by8 opinions
- Corral v. Rollins Protective Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- World Trade Knitting Mills, Inc. v. Lido Knitting Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Failla v. A. F. A. Protective Systems, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Appliance Associates, Inc. v. Dyce-Lymen Sprinkler Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Albany Insurance v. United Alarm Services, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.