Legal Opinion

Smith v. Southern Pacific Co.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1928No. 2797PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Coleman, J.:

This case is before the court on the motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal which was taken from the order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial.

The ground of the motion is that the appeal was not taken within six months from the rendition of the judgment in the case. It is conceded that the appeal was taken within 60 days from the entry of the order appealed from.

The time within which an appeal may be taken is fixed by section 5329, Rev. Laws (section 387, Civ. Code), as amended by chapter 91, Stats. 1913, which reads:

“An appeal may be taken:
“1.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stuart v. LairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. State ex rel. Cardwell v. GlennNevada Supreme Court · 1883
  3. State ex rel. Bartlett v. BrodiganNevada Supreme Court · 1914
  4. O'Neil v. New York & Silver Peak Mining Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Arnold v. StevensonNevada Supreme Court · 1866

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Afriat v. AfriatNevada Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. WebsterNevada Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Davis v. DavisNevada Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Prouse v. ProuseNevada Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. WebsterNevada Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API