Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bartlett v. Brodigan

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1914No. 2131PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Original proceeding in prohibition by the State, on the relation of George A. Bartlett, against George Brodigan, as Secretary of State.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

McCarran, J.:

This is an original proceeding in prohibition wherein the petitioner, as a taxpayer of the State of Nevada, seeks to prohibit the secretary of state from issuing official certificates of nomination for the office of district judge to more than one person for each political party in any of the judicial districts in the State of Nevada, except the Second judicial district.

The legislature of 1913 (Stats. 1913, c. 144) seeking to redistrict the State of Nevada, and to increase the number of judicial districts, and to provide judges therefor, passed an act, the title of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. George v. SwiftNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  2. State ex rel. Chase v. RogersNevada Supreme Court · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Cardwell v. GlennNevada Supreme Court · 1883
  4. State Ex Rel. Coffin v. HowellNevada Supreme Court · 1901
  5. State Ex Rel. Osburn v. BeckNevada Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  2. Woofter v. O'DONNELLNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency v. Brian McKay Attorney General of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. List v. WhislerNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State Ex Rel. 1625 East Washington Realty Co. v. MarkeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API