Royal v. McPhail
Supreme Court of Georgia
Gerliorari. Before Judge Smith. Pulaski superior court. February term, 1895. To the statement of facts in the opinion, it may be added that, after overruling the motion to dismiss, the superior court sustained the writ of certiorari, and rendered final judgment in favor of the defendant; and the plaintiff excepted.
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
The plaintiff sued the defendant in the county court upon an open account for work done for and material furnished to one O’Brien, a contractor who was to furnish material to build a storehouse for the defendant. The plaintiff was a mechanic and material man, and as such furnished certain material to be used in the construction of the house. Upon the trial of the case, the plaintiff proved such facts as would satisfactorily establish the indebtedness of the defendant to him, together with the claim of lien set up by him. There was no contested question of fact, but the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lombard v. Trustees of the Young Men's Library Ass'n FundSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- Castleberry v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Greenwood v. Boyd & Baxter Furniture FactorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mullis v. McCookSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Clayton v. Farrar Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Hunnicutt & Bellingrath Co. v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Methodist Episcopal Church South v. Dudley Sash, Door, & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Armour v. LunsfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.