Legal Opinion

ASPINWALL v. Ryan

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1951PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

Suit for specific performance of an instrument alleged to be a contract for the sale and purchase of real property.

On November 3, 1942, certain of the defendants, doing business as a partnership under the assumed name of Calapooya Lumber Co., delivered to Ray Aspinwall an instrument in writing as follows:

“We hereby sell to Ray Aspinwall all of SE NE - NE-SE-NW-SE- 40’s of section 20 and SW-NW-SE NW and lots 2 and 3 in section 21 all in TWP 14 S Range 2W for $1,000.00 Payment of $100.00 acknowledged balance on delivery of Deed. Dated this 3rd day of November 1942

‘ ‘ Calapooya Lumber Co.

“by F.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Clarno v. GraysonOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Losei Realty Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Strong v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. Warner Valley Stock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. McLamb v. T.P., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  2. Jackson v. AxtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. Killam v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Heinzel v. BackstromOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. McLellan v. CharlyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API