Legal Opinion

State of Utah v. Manatau

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2014No. 20100908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice DURHAM,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 In this appeal, we address whether the trial court erred by denying defendant Afu-hia Manatau’s motion to dismiss the charges against him on double jeopardy grounds. We specifically address whether the double jeopardy clause of the Utah Constitution barred Mr. Manatau’s retrial when a trial judge declared a mistrial without establishing legal necessity to do so. We conclude that the burden to create a record for and sufficiently justify the mistrial fell on the trial court and the State, not the defendant. We further conclude that legal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. State v. WhitmanUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. State v. AmbroseUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State v. HarrisUtah Supreme Court · 2004

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Discipline of Jere B. ReneerUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Salt Lake City v. Reyes-GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
  3. State v. MittonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2024
  4. State v. MittonUtah Supreme Court · 2026
  5. State v. MittonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API