Legal Opinion
State v. Harris
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 2004No. 20020656PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEHRING, Justice:
" 1 In this interlocutory appeal, we address whether the trial court erred in denying de*1254fendant Dustyn Harris's motion to dismiss. Specifically, we examine whether the double jeopardy provision of the Utah Constitution prohibits Mr. Harris's retrial where the first trial judge, after discovering that the courtroom recording equipment had failed to ree-ord the morning trial proceedings, declared a mistrial over Mr. Harris's objection. Because we conclude that the first trial judge abused his discretion in concluding that legal necessity required the mistrial, we reverse the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. WorwoodUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BondUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2019
- Pleasant Grove City v. TerryUtah Supreme Court · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.