Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Discipline of Jere B. Reneer

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2014No. 20120760PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice DURHAM,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

1 Attorney Jere Reneer appeals the decision of the Utah Supreme Court's Ethics and Discipline Committee (discipline committee) to privately admonish him for violating rules 1.8(F) and 8.4(a) of the Utah Rules of Professional Conduct. We hold that the Office of Professional Conduct (OPC) did not produce substantial evidence that Mr. Reneer violated rule 1.8(f) by failing to obtain the informed consent of his client to receive compensation from a third party. Moreover, rule 8.4(a) may not be used as an independent ground for attorney discipline.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Margulies Ex Rel. Margulies v. UpchurchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Matter of Discipline of BabilisUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re KnowltonUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Becker v. Sunset CityUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Utah State Bar v. JardineUtah Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Steffensen v. Office of Prof'l Conduct (In Re Steffensen)Utah Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Discipline of Brian SteffensenUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Leavitt v. Office of Professional ConductUtah Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API