Pray v. Kidd Williams Drilling Corporation
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
352 P.2d 380 (1960)
Max PRAY, Plaintiff in Error,
v.
KIDD WILLIAMS DRILLING CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant in Error.
No. 37979.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
March 8, 1960.
Brown & Brown, Oklahoma City, by Paul Brown, Oklahoma City, for plaintiff in error.
Monnet, Monnet & Monnet, Tulsa, by Buford D. Monnet, Tulsa, for defendant in error.
JACKSON, Justice.
This is an appeal by defendant, Max Pray, from judgment on directed verdict for plaintiff, Kidd Williams Drilling Corporation, in the amount of $24,128.07, as balance due under terms of a certain written contract. In accordance with said…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gamble v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Wiebener v. PeoplesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Coston v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- McDowell v. DrozSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.