People v. De Carlo
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Yolo County and from orders denying a new trial and denying a motion in arrest of judgment. E. E. Gaddis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The appellant was convicted of perjury, and after the verdict moved for a new trial, which was denied, and then moved in arrest of judgment upon the ground that the facts stated in the information do not constitute a public offense. This motion having been denied, judgment was pronounced against him, from which he has appealed.
The information against the defendant is as follows: “Walter De Carlo is accused by the district attorney of Yolo county, by this information, of the crime of perjury, committed as follows, to wit: That the said Walter De Carlo, on or about the fifteenth day of July,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. PhelpsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- State v. PetersTexas Supreme Court · 1874
- Commonwealth v. KnightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. BixbyWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. IngelsWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Gray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
- People v. EnnisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.