Legal Opinion

Hall v. LaRonde

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 7, 1997No. B107423PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GILBERT, J.

Here the long arm of the Internet reaches from California to New York. We hold that the use of electronic mail and the telephone by a party in another state may establish sufficient minimum contacts with California to support personal jurisdiction. We reverse a judgment of dismissal arising from the trial court’s grant of defendant’s motion to quash service.

Facts

Appellant, Blake Hall alleged in his complaint that in September of 1994 he entered into a contract with Brad LaRonde doing business as LaRonde Technical Consulting. The contract authorized LaRonde to sell licenses…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Vons Companies, Inc. v. Seabest Foods, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Tiffany Records, Inc. v. M. B. Krupp Distributors, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Interdyne Co. v. SYS Computer Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Chemtall, Inc. v. Citi-Chem, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1998
  2. Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. F. McConnell & Sons, Inc. v. Target Data Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
  4. Jewish Defense Organization, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Bombardier Recreational Products, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Canada ULCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API