Legal Opinion
Hunt v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 2000No. D034797PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
Janetter Hunt (Janetter) signed an agreement in the form of an equipment lease (the lease) to finance the acquisition of equipment for her Maryland business, and Michael Hunt (Michael; Janetter and Michael together, the Hunts) guaranteed Janetter’s obligations under the lease. The Hunts reside in Maryland, all negotiations to acquire the equipment occurred in Maryland, the documents to consummate the transaction were signed in Maryland, and the equipment was to be delivered in Maryland. The only California connection to the transaction was that real party in interest…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. ShuteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Hunt Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Supreme Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Smith, Valentino & Smith, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Aral v. Earthlink, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- INTERSHOP COMMUNICATIONS, AG v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Beltran v. AuPairCare, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.