Crocker-Wheeler Co. v. Varick Realty Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal by the defendants from a judgment of the City Court of the city of Rew York, rendered in favor of the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
The plaintiff contracted with the defendant Varick Eealty Company to furnish and install, in a building owned by said defendant, two electric elevators. One of the elevators was to be in operation by February 2, 1903; the installation of the other to be completed as quickly as possible after the installation of the first; ten days being mentioned as the probable time. It is made clear by the evidence that much stress was laid by defendant upon the necessity of having at least one elevator in running order by February second, and that plaintiff was distinctly notified that no contract would be…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dunn v. . SteubingNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Grannis & Hurd Lumber Co. v. DeevesNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frankfurt-Barnett Co. v. William Prym Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Leigland v. Rundle Land & Abstract Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re Regional Building Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2001
- Stephens v. Weyl-Zuckerman & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Mohn v. New York & Pennsylvania Smokeless Coal Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.