Legal Opinion

Ristine v. Clements

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1903No. 4,602PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Montgomery Circuit Court; Jere West, Judge. Action by Dora Clements against Ilosea Ristine and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant Ristine appeals, and appellee Clements assigns cross-errors.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

This cause was transferred from the Supreme Court under the act of March 12, 1901.

Suit by appellee to recover one-third of the proceeds of the sale of certain land owned by her husband, and to enjoin the sheriff from paying such money to certain judgment creditors of the husband.

The court found the facts as follows: Dora and Robert Clements are husband and wife, Robert Clements being a householder having property of all descriptions worth less than $600. In 1888 he became the owner of certain real estate particularly described, and borrowed from the Ladoga Building Association $1,400, and to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Bills v. City of GoshenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Citizens' Gas & Mining Co. v. Town of ElwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. McLeod v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Indianapolis v. BielerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Swindell v. State ex rel. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anderson-Kerr, Inc. v. Van MeterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Meyer v. SeifertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  3. Town of Gallup v. Gallup Cold Storage Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Kraus v. LehmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API