Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Mann

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 27, 1912No. 7,735PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Benton Circuit Court; James T. Saunderson, Judge. Action by William D. Hurst and others against Allen W. Mann and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, C. J.

— Action by appellants against appellees to quiet title in which appellees recovered judgment. Appellants have assigned error in sustaining demurrers to the second, third and fourth paragraphs of complaint, and in overruling their motion for new trial.

1. They have not set out in their brief the demurrers or the grounds thereof, nor the motion for a new trial or the grounds thereof. These failures to comply with the rules of this court are alone sufficient to cause us to affirm the judgment. Rule 22, Supreme and Appellate Courts; Holliday v. Anheier (1910), 174 Ind. 729, 93 N. E. 1; Anderson…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Jackson v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Norris v. ScottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Holliday v. AnheierIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Anderson v. LeonardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McKern v. BeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API