Legal Opinion

Holliday v. Anheier

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1910No. 21,589PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From White Circuit Court; Harry C. Sheridan, Special Judge. Suit by Anthony A. Anheier against Charles A. Holliday and another. From a decree for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellee brought this action to foreclose certain sewer assessment liens. Said sewer was constructed in 1907, in the town of Monticello, under §265 of the cities and towns act of 1905 (Acts 1905 p. 219, §8959 Burns 1908).

The alleged errors relied on for reversal are, “(1) the overruling’ of the separate demurrer to each paragraph of the complaint, and (2) the sustaining of the demurrer to appellants’ answer.”

Appellee insists that as appellants have not set out in their brief a copy of each of said demurrers, tlieir substance, a succinct statement or the grounds thereof, as required by clause…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago Terminal Transfer Railroad v. WaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Hall v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. American Food Co. v. HalsteadIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Tisdale v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Huber Manufacturing Co. v. BlessingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Rowan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Newman v. HornerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Wilt v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Anderson v. LeonardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API