Legal Opinion

People v. Surety Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 26, 1985No. F003829PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

This case comes to us on appeal by Surety Insurance Company of California (Surety), a corporate surety, from a Merced County trial court’s order denying its motion (1) to vacate summary judgment on a forfeited bail bond, and (2) to exonerate the written undertaking. It is appellant’s contention that the trial court lost jurisdiction to declare a forfeiture when it failed to declare the bail bond forfeited and continued the case the first time defendant failed to appear for arraignment for judgment and sentencing. Appellant maintains there is no showing in the record or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Burtnett v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  4. People v. Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Cosenza v. KramerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  2. County of Los Angeles v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. People v. Ranger InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. People v. Ranger Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. People v. Amwest Surety InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API