Legal Opinion

Rollings v. Smith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1999No. 84A01-9809-CV-362PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Paul Prose withdrew funds from joint bank accounts owned by him and his wife, Blanche, and deposited the funds first in his own account and then in a joint account with his niece, Dulcia Smith. When Paul died, Smith received the money. Marge W. Rollings, as Blanche’s guardian, filed suit challenging those transfers. Rollings eventually moved for summary judgment and demanded the return of all transferred funds. The court granted summary judgment in favor of Rollings, but decided that Rollings was entitled to only one-half of the funds at issue.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. Lovold Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Shourek v. StirlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rogers v. RogersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Harvest Life Insurance v. GetcheIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Matter of Estate of BankoIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hudson v. DavisIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Infinity Products, Inc. v. QuandtIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Connecticut v. Sandoz, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
  4. Dominiack Mechanical, Inc. v. DunbarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Dominiack Mechanical, Inc. v. DunbarIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API