Legal Opinion

Infinity Products, Inc. v. Quandt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2002No. 29A02-0105-CV-280PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

In October 1996, Infinity Products, Inc. (“Infinity”) sued Herbert Quandt (“Quandt”) and Fabri-Tech, Inc. (“Fabri-Tech”), alleging misappropriation of trade secrets and conversion. Quandt and Fa-bri-Tech filed counterclaims. Following a bench trial, the court entered judgment against Quandt in the amount of $1,017,937.04. The court later reduced the judgment to $763,253.24. The court did not find Fabri-Tech liable.

Infinity presents two issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as:

1. Whether the trial court erred when it failed to hold…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Stropes Ex Rel. Taylor v. Heritage House Childrens Center of Shelbyville, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Sword v. NKC Hospitals, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Terre Haute Industries, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Jerry Alderman Ford Sales, Inc. v. BaileyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Warner Trucking, Inc. v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Infinity Products, Inc. v. QuandtIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. The Estate of Richard A. Mayer, and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty v. Lax, Inc., and David LascoIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Buschman v. ADS CORP.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Evans v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. CAMPBELL v. VALTRANS EXPRESS, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API