Legal Opinion
Federal Land Bank of Columbia v. Maney
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided September 20, 1933PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
The Court being evenly divided in opinion, Brogden, J., not sitting, the judgment stands affirmed without becoming a precedent in accordance with the general rule of appellate courts in such situations. Garrison v. R. R., 202 N. C., 851, 164 S. E., 115; Nebel v. Nebel, 201 N. C., 840, 161 S. E., 223; Durham v. Lloyd, 200 N. C., 803, 157 S. E., 136.
Affirmed.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nebel v. NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Nebel v. . NebelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Durham v. . LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Davis v. . McDevittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Garrison v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
3Cited by1 opinion
- O'Harra v. O'HarraOhio Court of Appeals · 1939